<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Samsung PN50B650 Review – 50-inch Plasma HDTV</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleverreviews.com/reviews/plasma-tv-reviews/samsung-pn50b650-review-50-inch-plasma-hdtv/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleverreviews.com/reviews/plasma-tv-reviews/samsung-pn50b650-review-50-inch-plasma-hdtv/</link>
	<description>HDTV &#38; Electronics Reviews - Ratings on Vizio, Sony, Samsung, Sharp, Toshiba, Pioneer, Hitachi, LG, Mitsubishi, Panasonic &#38; More</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Jul 2010 01:47:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tess</title>
		<link>http://cleverreviews.com/reviews/plasma-tv-reviews/samsung-pn50b650-review-50-inch-plasma-hdtv/comment-page-1/#comment-5326</link>
		<dc:creator>Tess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 17:37:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleverreviews.com/?p=1165#comment-5326</guid>
		<description>Both the 550 and 650 seem like comparable sets. The only difference between them that I can see is the media connectivity. I am assuming that it is these additional features which give the 650 a superior rating. In terms of performance, they should be the same. If you don&#039;t need the media features, the 550 is more than adequate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Both the 550 and 650 seem like comparable sets. The only difference between them that I can see is the media connectivity. I am assuming that it is these additional features which give the 650 a superior rating. In terms of performance, they should be the same. If you don&#8217;t need the media features, the 550 is more than adequate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathlene</title>
		<link>http://cleverreviews.com/reviews/plasma-tv-reviews/samsung-pn50b650-review-50-inch-plasma-hdtv/comment-page-1/#comment-3095</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathlene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 23:40:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleverreviews.com/?p=1165#comment-3095</guid>
		<description>I just came across your site. I like the way you have it laid out. This is a very nice review. The 50&quot;er is looks like it may be a nice addition to any home theater. Thanks for the nice review.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just came across your site. I like the way you have it laid out. This is a very nice review. The 50&#8243;er is looks like it may be a nice addition to any home theater. Thanks for the nice review.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LCD Man</title>
		<link>http://cleverreviews.com/reviews/plasma-tv-reviews/samsung-pn50b650-review-50-inch-plasma-hdtv/comment-page-1/#comment-2911</link>
		<dc:creator>LCD Man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 11:09:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleverreviews.com/?p=1165#comment-2911</guid>
		<description>It looks very attractive and according to performance it seems like a great buy. Low power consumption,good contrast ratio, high quality images are its best features. Thanks for the info on this LCD</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks very attractive and according to performance it seems like a great buy. Low power consumption,good contrast ratio, high quality images are its best features. Thanks for the info on this LCD</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
